2019-20 Standings

  Conference
-
Overall
-
LEAGUE PTS GP W-L-T PCT GF GA GP W-L-T PCT GF GA L10 STRK
1 Cornell * 41 22 19-0-3 0.932 84 16 33 28-2-3 0.894 127 31 9-1 Lost 1
2 Princeton 35 22 17-4-1 0.795 77 40 33 26-6-1 0.803 122 57 8-2 Won 3
3 Clarkson 32 22 14-4-4 0.727 63 29 37 25-6-6 0.757 111 55 7-2-1 Lost 1
4 Harvard 31 22 15-6-1 0.705 69 53 33 18-14-1 0.561 93 89 6-4 Lost 1
5 Yale 26 22 13-9 0.591 53 49 32 17-15-0 0.531 86 81 4-6 Lost 1
6 Colgate 25 22 11-8-3 0.568 71 43 38 17-15-6 0.526 110 84 4-4-2 Lost 2
7 Quinnipiac 24 22 11-9-2 0.545 63 43 37 19-15-3 0.554 102 72 6-4 Lost 1
8 St. Lawrence 20 22 8-10-4 0.455 34 43 36 13-16-7 0.458 73 83 2-6-2 Lost 3
e Union 13 22 5-14-3 0.295 39 74 34 5-24-5 0.221 52 115 2-8 Lost 7
e Dartmouth 11 22 4-15-3 0.250 36 70 29 7-19-3 0.293 52 91 2-8 Lost 2
e Brown 6 22 2-18-2 0.136 24 85 29 3-23-3 0.155 33 119 0-8-2 Lost 4
e Rensselaer 0 22 0-22 0.000 14 82 34 0-33-1 0.015 21 122 0-10 Lost 27
* Tournament Champion
x - Clinched Playoff Berth
# - Indicates Tournament Seed
e - Eliminated from Playoff Contention

Head to Head

Please Read From Top to Bottom, Not Left to Right for Accurate Stats
  BRN CLK COL COR DAR HAR PRI QUI RPI STL UNI YAL
Brown
XXX W, 6-0
W, 5-0
W, 3-1
W, 6-2
W, 9-1
W, 4-0
W, 3-2
T, 2-2
W, 4-1
W, 3-2
W, 4-1
W, 5-1
W, 3-1
W, 9-1
L, 2-1
L, 2-0
W, 4-0
T, 1-1
W, 4-1
W, 3-1
W, 3-1
W, 3-1
Clarkson
L, 6-0
L, 5-0
XXX L, 2-1
T, 2-2
T, 1-1
T, 1-1
L, 5-1
L, 2-1
L, 4-0
L, 4-1
W, 2-1
L, 2-1
T, 2-2
W, 2-1
L, 5-4
L, 5-0
L, 2-1
W, 1-0
L, 4-0
L, 5-3
W, 5-2
L, 2-0
Colgate
L, 3-1
L, 6-2
W, 2-1
T, 2-2
XXX W, 2-0
W, 5-0
L, 5-2
L, 4-2
L, 5-2
W, 4-3
W, 1-0
W, 7-5
L, 4-2
W, 2-1
L, 4-1
L, 9-0
T, 0-0
T, 1-1
L, 4-0
L, 7-0
L, 4-0
W, 5-3
Cornell
L, 9-1
L, 4-0
T, 1-1
T, 1-1
L, 2-0
L, 5-0
XXX L, 5-1
L, 3-0
L, 7-0
L, 4-1
L, 3-1
L, 5-1
L, 1-0
L, 4-1
L, 2-0
L, 4-0
L, 4-1
L, 3-2
T, 1-1
L, 5-3
L, 6-0
L, 5-1
Dartmouth
L, 3-2
T, 2-2
W, 5-1
W, 2-1
W, 5-2
W, 4-2
W, 5-1
W, 3-0
XXX W, 7-4
W, 4-0
W, 2-1
W, 7-0
T, 1-1
W, 5-1
L, 4-0
L, 4-1
W, 5-1
W, 3-2
T, 3-3
L, 2-0
W, 1-0
W, 3-1
Harvard
L, 4-1
L, 3-2
W, 4-0
W, 4-1
W, 5-2
L, 4-3
W, 7-0
W, 4-1
L, 7-4
L, 4-0
XXX L, 6-2
T, 3-3
L, 3-2
W, 2-1
L, 3-0
L, 3-1
L, 2-1
L, 3-0
L, 7-2
L, 3-2
L, 5-2
L, 4-2
Princeton
L, 4-1
L, 5-1
L, 2-1
W, 2-1
L, 1-0
L, 7-5
W, 3-1
W, 5-1
L, 2-1
L, 7-0
W, 6-2
T, 3-3
XXX L, 4-2
L, 3-2
L, 4-1
L, 3-1
L, 6-2
L, 4-0
L, 7-2
L, 3-0
L, 2-1
L, 5-1
Quinnipiac
L, 3-1
L, 9-1
T, 2-2
L, 2-1
W, 4-2
L, 2-1
W, 1-0
W, 4-1
T, 1-1
L, 5-1
W, 3-2
L, 2-1
W, 4-2
W, 3-2
XXX L, 4-0
L, 5-1
L, 5-0
W, 3-2
W, 4-2
L, 6-2
L, 3-1
W, 4-1
Rensselaer
W, 2-1
W, 2-0
W, 5-4
W, 5-0
W, 4-1
W, 9-0
W, 2-0
W, 4-0
W, 4-0
W, 4-1
W, 3-0
W, 3-1
W, 4-1
W, 3-1
W, 4-0
W, 5-1
XXX W, 2-1
W, 3-0
W, 5-1
W, 2-0
W, 3-0
W, 4-1
St. Lawrence
L, 4-0
T, 1-1
W, 2-1
L, 1-0
T, 0-0
T, 1-1
W, 4-1
W, 3-2
L, 5-1
L, 3-2
W, 2-1
W, 3-0
W, 6-2
W, 4-0
W, 5-0
L, 3-2
L, 2-1
L, 3-0
XXX T, 1-1
L, 2-0
W, 2-1
W, 3-0
Union
L, 4-1
L, 3-1
W, 4-0
W, 5-3
W, 4-0
W, 7-0
T, 1-1
W, 5-3
T, 3-3
W, 2-0
W, 7-2
W, 3-2
W, 7-2
W, 3-0
L, 4-2
W, 6-2
L, 5-1
L, 2-0
T, 1-1
W, 2-0
XXX W, 5-0
W, 4-2
Yale
L, 3-1
L, 3-1
L, 5-2
W, 2-0
W, 4-0
L, 5-3
W, 6-0
W, 5-1
L, 1-0
L, 3-1
W, 5-2
W, 4-2
W, 2-1
W, 5-1
W, 3-1
L, 4-1
L, 3-0
L, 4-1
L, 2-1
L, 3-0
L, 5-0
L, 4-2
XXX

Tie-Breaking Procedures for Championship Seeding

ALBANY, N.Y. -- Following are the ECAC women's Hockey Championship policies pertaining to seeding and tie-breaking procedures.

Seeding for championship competition is based on total points accumulated during league contests. In the event teams are tied in the final regular-season standings, the following tiebreakers (listed in order of application) shall be used to determine seeding. (Note: Only League games apply):

  1. Comparison of game results between tied teams (head to head).
  2. Wins.
  3. Comparison of results of games against the top four teams.
  4. Comparison of results of games against the top eight teams.
  5. Goal differential in head-to-head competition.
  6. Goal differential in games against the top four teams.
  7. Goal differential in games against the top eight teams.

In the case of ties among three or more schools, the criteria will be used in order until a team, or teams, is separated from the pack. At that point, the process will begin anew to break the "new" tie. In other words, when a four-way tie becomes a three-way tie, the three-way tie is treated as a "new" tie and the process begins with the first criterion.