2019-20 Standings

  Conference
-
Overall
-
LEAGUE PTS GP W-L-T PCT GF GA GP W-L-T PCT GF GA L10 STRK
1 Cornell * 37 20 17-0-3 0.925 75 13 27 23-1-3 0.907 102 21 9-0-1 Won 5
y Princeton 31 20 15-4-1 0.775 67 38 26 20-5-1 0.788 94 46 8-1-1 Lost 1
y Harvard 29 20 14-5-1 0.725 65 49 27 15-11-1 0.574 78 74 5-5 Won 2
x Clarkson 28 20 12-4-4 0.700 57 27 32 21-5-6 0.750 100 47 6-2-2 Won 1
x Yale 24 20 12-8 0.600 48 43 27 15-12-0 0.556 74 64 6-4 Lost 1
x Quinnipiac 22 20 10-8-2 0.550 53 38 32 17-12-3 0.578 86 57 6-4 Lost 1
x Colgate 21 20 9-8-3 0.525 55 43 34 15-12-7 0.544 92 75 4-4-2 Won 1
x St. Lawrence 18 20 7-9-4 0.450 31 38 32 12-13-7 0.484 66 68 4-4-2 Won 1
e Union 13 20 5-12-3 0.325 36 62 32 5-22-5 0.234 49 103 3-7 Lost 5
e Dartmouth 11 20 4-13-3 0.275 33 65 27 7-17-3 0.315 49 86 2-8 Won 2
e Brown 6 20 2-16-2 0.150 22 71 27 3-21-3 0.167 31 105 1-7-2 Lost 2
e Rensselaer 0 20 0-20 0.000 14 69 32 0-31-1 0.016 21 109 0-10 Lost 25
* Tournament Champion
x - Clinched Playoff Berth
# - Indicates Tournament Seed
e - Eliminated from Playoff Contention

Head to Head

Please Read From Top to Bottom, Not Left to Right for Accurate Stats
  BRN CLK COL COR DAR HAR PRI QUI RPI STL UNI YAL
Brown
XXX W, 6-0
W, 5-0
W, 3-1
W, 6-2
W, 9-1
W, 4-0
W, 3-2
T, 2-2
W, 4-1
W, 3-2
W, 4-1

W, 3-1

L, 2-1
L, 2-0
W, 4-0
T, 1-1
W, 4-1
W, 3-1
W, 3-1
W, 3-1
Clarkson
L, 6-0
L, 5-0
XXX L, 2-1
T, 2-2
T, 1-1
T, 1-1
L, 5-1

L, 4-0

W, 2-1
L, 2-1
T, 2-2
W, 2-1
L, 5-4
L, 5-0
L, 2-1
W, 1-0
L, 4-0
L, 5-3
W, 5-2
L, 2-0
Colgate
L, 3-1
L, 6-2
W, 2-1
T, 2-2
XXX W, 2-0
W, 5-0
L, 5-2
L, 4-2
L, 5-2
W, 4-3
W, 1-0
W, 7-5
L, 4-2
W, 2-1
L, 4-1

T, 0-0
T, 1-1
L, 4-0

L, 4-0
W, 5-3
Cornell
L, 9-1
L, 4-0
T, 1-1
T, 1-1
L, 2-0
L, 5-0
XXX L, 5-1
L, 3-0
L, 7-0
L, 4-1
L, 3-1
L, 5-1
L, 1-0
L, 4-1
L, 2-0

L, 4-1
L, 3-2
T, 1-1

L, 6-0
L, 5-1
Dartmouth
L, 3-2
T, 2-2
W, 5-1

W, 5-2
W, 4-2
W, 5-1
W, 3-0
XXX W, 7-4
W, 4-0
W, 2-1
W, 7-0
T, 1-1
W, 5-1
L, 4-0
L, 4-1
W, 5-1

T, 3-3
L, 2-0
W, 1-0
W, 3-1
Harvard
L, 4-1
L, 3-2
W, 4-0

W, 5-2
L, 4-3
W, 7-0
W, 4-1
L, 7-4
L, 4-0
XXX L, 6-2
T, 3-3
L, 3-2
W, 2-1
L, 3-0
L, 3-1
L, 2-1

L, 7-2
L, 3-2
L, 5-2
L, 4-2
Princeton
L, 4-1

L, 2-1
W, 2-1
L, 1-0
L, 7-5
W, 3-1
W, 5-1
L, 2-1
L, 7-0
W, 6-2
T, 3-3
XXX L, 4-2
L, 3-2
L, 4-1
L, 3-1
L, 6-2
L, 4-0
L, 7-2
L, 3-0
L, 2-1

Quinnipiac
L, 3-1

T, 2-2
L, 2-1
W, 4-2
L, 2-1
W, 1-0
W, 4-1
T, 1-1
L, 5-1
W, 3-2
L, 2-1
W, 4-2
W, 3-2
XXX L, 4-0
L, 5-1
L, 5-0
W, 3-2
W, 4-2
L, 6-2
L, 3-1

Rensselaer
W, 2-1
W, 2-0
W, 5-4
W, 5-0
W, 4-1

W, 2-0

W, 4-0
W, 4-1
W, 3-0
W, 3-1
W, 4-1
W, 3-1
W, 4-0
W, 5-1
XXX W, 2-1
W, 3-0
W, 5-1
W, 2-0
W, 3-0
W, 4-1
St. Lawrence
L, 4-0
T, 1-1
W, 2-1
L, 1-0
T, 0-0
T, 1-1
W, 4-1
W, 3-2
L, 5-1

W, 2-1

W, 6-2
W, 4-0
W, 5-0
L, 3-2
L, 2-1
L, 3-0
XXX T, 1-1
L, 2-0
W, 2-1
W, 3-0
Union
L, 4-1
L, 3-1
W, 4-0
W, 5-3
W, 4-0

T, 1-1

T, 3-3
W, 2-0
W, 7-2
W, 3-2
W, 7-2
W, 3-0
L, 4-2
W, 6-2
L, 5-1
L, 2-0
T, 1-1
W, 2-0
XXX W, 5-0
W, 4-2
Yale
L, 3-1
L, 3-1
L, 5-2
W, 2-0
W, 4-0
L, 5-3
W, 6-0
W, 5-1
L, 1-0
L, 3-1
W, 5-2
W, 4-2
W, 2-1

W, 3-1

L, 3-0
L, 4-1
L, 2-1
L, 3-0
L, 5-0
L, 4-2
XXX

Tie-Breaking Procedures for Championship Seeding

ALBANY, N.Y. -- Following are the ECAC women's Hockey Championship policies pertaining to seeding and tie-breaking procedures.

Seeding for championship competition is based on total points accumulated during league contests. In the event teams are tied in the final regular-season standings, the following tiebreakers (listed in order of application) shall be used to determine seeding. (Note: Only League games apply):

  1. Comparison of game results between tied teams (head to head).
  2. Wins.
  3. Comparison of results of games against the top four teams.
  4. Comparison of results of games against the top eight teams.
  5. Goal differential in head-to-head competition.
  6. Goal differential in games against the top four teams.
  7. Goal differential in games against the top eight teams.

In the case of ties among three or more schools, the criteria will be used in order until a team, or teams, is separated from the pack. At that point, the process will begin anew to break the "new" tie. In other words, when a four-way tie becomes a three-way tie, the three-way tie is treated as a "new" tie and the process begins with the first criterion.