2019-20 Standings

  Conference
-
Overall
-
LEAGUE PTS GP W-L-T PCT GF GA GP W-L-T PCT GF GA L10 STRK
1 Cornell * 38 22 18-2-2 0.864 81 34 29 23-2-4 0.862 104 45 9-1 Won 9
2 Clarkson 33 22 16-5-1 0.750 63 38 34 23-8-3 0.721 96 63 6-3-1 Lost 1
3 Quinnipiac 30 22 14-6-2 0.682 64 45 34 21-11-2 0.647 94 78 7-2-1 Won 3
4 Rensselaer 27 22 13-8-1 0.614 63 41 34 17-15-2 0.529 95 87 7-3 Won 4
5 Harvard 27 22 11-6-5 0.614 82 59 31 15-10-6 0.581 116 87 5-3-2 Won 3
6 Dartmouth 22 22 10-10-2 0.500 60 73 31 13-14-4 0.484 93 106 3-7 Lost 3
7 Yale 22 22 10-10-2 0.500 57 64 32 15-15-2 0.500 77 97 6-3-1 Won 2
8 Colgate 21 22 8-9-5 0.477 50 54 36 12-16-8 0.444 76 87 3-5-2 Won 2
9 Brown 18 22 8-12-2 0.409 41 54 31 8-21-2 0.290 52 84 3-5-2 Lost 2
10 Union 12 22 5-15-2 0.273 46 71 36 8-25-3 0.264 66 111 2-7-1 Lost 2
11 Princeton 8 22 2-16-4 0.182 39 69 31 6-20-5 0.274 66 100 3-6-1 Won 2
12 St. Lawrence 6 22 2-18-2 0.136 37 81 36 4-27-5 0.181 64 130 1-7-2 Lost 2
* Tournament Champion
x - Clinched Playoff Berth
# - Indicates Tournament Seed
e - Eliminated from Playoff Contention

Head to Head

Please Read From Top to Bottom, Not Left to Right for Accurate Stats
  BRN CLK COL COR DAR HAR PRI QUI RPI STL UNI YAL
Brown
XXX W, 2-1
W, 4-1
L, 4-1
L, 3-1
W, 4-1
W, 3-0
W, 4-1
W, 5-2
W, 4-1
T, 1-1
L, 4-3
L, 2-0
T, 2-2
W, 2-1
W, 2-1
W, 3-1
L, 3-2
L, 2-0
W, 5-0
L, 3-2
W, 3-2
L, 5-1
Clarkson
L, 2-1
L, 4-1
XXX L, 5-1
T, 1-1
W, 4-2
W, 5-1
W, 3-2
L, 4-0
L, 5-3
W, 5-2
L, 2-1
L, 3-1
L, 5-2
L, 3-2
L, 2-1
W, 3-1
L, 3-1
L, 2-0
L, 5-1
L, 2-0
L, 4-1
L, 3-1
Colgate
W, 4-1
W, 3-1
W, 5-1
T, 1-1
XXX W, 4-1
W, 5-3
L, 5-1
T, 3-3
L, 4-3
T, 3-3
T, 2-2
L, 3-0
L, 3-1
W, 2-1
W, 3-0
W, 4-1
L, 4-1
T, 2-2
L, 3-2
L, 4-0
L, 2-1
W, 4-2
Cornell
L, 4-1
L, 3-0
L, 4-2
L, 5-1
L, 4-1
L, 5-3
XXX W, 2-1
L, 3-2
L, 3-1
T, 1-1
L, 5-1
L, 5-3
L, 2-1
W, 5-0
L, 3-0
L, 4-2
L, 6-1
L, 5-0
T, 3-3
L, 5-2
L, 6-2
L, 4-0
Dartmouth
L, 4-1
L, 5-2
L, 3-2
W, 4-0
W, 5-1
T, 3-3
L, 2-1
W, 3-2
XXX W, 7-3
W, 6-2
L, 3-1
L, 4-3
T, 2-2
W, 5-1
W, 7-1
W, 4-1
L, 3-1
L, 5-2
W, 4-3
L, 5-3
L, 4-3
W, 4-3
Harvard
L, 4-1
T, 1-1
W, 5-3
L, 5-2
W, 4-3
T, 3-3
W, 3-1
T, 1-1
L, 7-3
L, 6-2
XXX L, 3-0
T, 3-3
L, 7-2
W, 6-1
L, 6-3
W, 2-0
L, 3-1
W, 6-3
L, 8-5
L, 4-1
L, 6-1
T, 4-4
Princeton
W, 4-3
W, 2-0
W, 2-1
W, 3-1
T, 2-2
W, 3-0
W, 5-1
W, 5-3
W, 3-1
W, 4-3
W, 3-0
T, 3-3
XXX W, 3-1
W, 4-3
T, 2-2
W, 7-1
L, 1-0
L, 6-3
W, 2-1
T, 2-2
W, 5-3
W, 2-1
Quinnipiac
T, 2-2
L, 2-1
W, 5-2
W, 3-2
W, 3-1
L, 2-1
W, 2-1
L, 5-0
T, 2-2
L, 5-1
W, 7-2
L, 6-1
L, 3-1
L, 4-3
XXX L, 3-1
W, 4-0
L, 3-2
L, 6-1
L, 2-1
L, 3-2
L, 3-2
L, 5-0
Rensselaer
L, 2-1
L, 3-1
W, 2-1
L, 3-1
L, 3-0
L, 4-1
W, 3-0
W, 4-2
L, 7-1
L, 4-1
W, 6-3
L, 2-0
T, 2-2
L, 7-1
W, 3-1
L, 4-0
XXX L, 6-2
L, 3-0
L, 3-2
W, 2-1
W, 4-1
W, 4-1
St. Lawrence
W, 3-2
W, 2-0
W, 3-1
W, 2-0
W, 4-1
T, 2-2
W, 6-1
W, 5-0
W, 3-1
W, 5-2
W, 3-1
L, 6-3
W, 1-0
W, 6-3
W, 3-2
W, 6-1
W, 6-2
W, 3-0
XXX L, 3-2
W, 5-4
W, 6-3
T, 2-2
Union
L, 5-0
W, 3-2
W, 5-1
W, 2-0
W, 3-2
W, 4-0
T, 3-3
W, 5-2
L, 4-3
W, 5-3
W, 8-5
W, 4-1
L, 2-1
T, 2-2
W, 2-1
W, 3-2
W, 3-2
L, 2-1
W, 3-2
L, 5-4
XXX W, 2-0
W, 5-0
Yale
L, 3-2
W, 5-1
W, 4-1
W, 3-1
W, 2-1
L, 4-2
W, 6-2
W, 4-0
W, 4-3
L, 4-3
W, 6-1
T, 4-4
L, 5-3
L, 2-1
W, 3-2
W, 5-0
L, 4-1
L, 4-1
L, 6-3
T, 2-2
L, 2-0
L, 5-0
XXX

Tie-Breaking Procedures for Championship Seeding

ALBANY, N.Y. -- Following are the ECAC Men's Hockey Championship policies pertaining to seeding and tie-breaking procedures.

Seeding for championship competition is based on total points accumulated during league contests. In the event teams are tied in the final regular-season standings, the following tiebreakers (listed in order of application) shall be used to determine seeding. (Note: Only League games apply):

  1. Comparison of game results between tied teams (head to head).
  2. Wins.
  3. Comparison of results of games against the top four teams.
  4. Comparison of results of games against the top eight teams.
  5. Goal differential in head-to-head competition.
  6. Goal differential in games against the top four teams.
  7. Goal differential in games against the top eight teams.

In the case of ties among three or more schools, the criteria will be used in order until a team, or teams, is separated from the pack. At that point, the process will begin anew to break the "new" tie. In other words, when a four-way tie becomes a three-way tie, the three-way tie is treated as a "new" tie and the process begins with the first criterion.