2019-20 Standings

  Conference
-
Overall
-
LEAGUE PTS GP W-L-T PCT GF GA GP W-L-T PCT GF GA L10 STRK
Clarkson 30 18 15-3 0.833 55 27 30 22-6-2 0.767 88 52 8-2 Won 5
Cornell 30 18 14-2-2 0.833 64 33 25 19-2-4 0.840 87 44 7-1-2 Won 5
Quinnipiac 24 18 11-5-2 0.667 54 38 30 18-10-2 0.633 84 71 6-3-1 Won 1
Harvard 23 18 9-4-5 0.639 70 48 25 11-8-6 0.560 92 72 3-3-4 Tied 2
Colgate 19 18 8-7-3 0.528 44 44 30 10-14-6 0.433 64 75 3-5-2 Won 1
Rensselaer 19 18 9-8-1 0.528 46 39 30 13-15-2 0.467 78 85 5-4-1 Lost 1
Dartmouth 18 18 8-8-2 0.500 49 60 25 11-10-4 0.520 75 84 4-5-1 Lost 1
Yale 18 18 8-8-2 0.500 51 52 25 11-12-2 0.480 65 80 5-3-2 Won 1
Brown 14 18 6-10-2 0.389 35 48 25 6-17-2 0.280 44 72 3-5-2 Tied 1
Union 11 18 5-12-1 0.306 38 57 29 7-20-2 0.276 53 91 1-7-2 Lost 2
Princeton 7 18 2-13-3 0.194 35 56 25 4-17-4 0.240 53 80 2-7-1 Lost 1
St. Lawrence 3 18 1-16-1 0.083 27 66 30 3-23-4 0.167 50 103 0-9-1 Lost 3
* Tournament Champion
x - Clinched Playoff Berth
# - Indicates Tournament Seed
e - Eliminated from Playoff Contention

Head to Head

Please Read From Top to Bottom, Not Left to Right for Accurate Stats
  BRN CLK COL COR DAR HAR PRI QUI RPI STL UNI YAL
Brown
XXX W, 2-1
W, 4-1
L, 4-1

W, 4-1

W, 4-1
W, 5-2
W, 4-1
T, 1-1
L, 4-3

T, 2-2

W, 2-1
W, 3-1
L, 3-2
L, 2-0
W, 5-0
L, 3-2
W, 3-2
L, 5-1
Clarkson
L, 2-1
L, 4-1
XXX L, 5-1

W, 4-2

W, 3-2

L, 5-3

L, 2-1
L, 3-1
L, 5-2
L, 3-2
L, 2-1
W, 3-1
L, 3-1
L, 2-0
L, 5-1
L, 2-0
L, 4-1
L, 3-1
Colgate
W, 4-1

W, 5-1

XXX W, 4-1
W, 5-3
L, 5-1
T, 3-3
L, 4-3
T, 3-3
T, 2-2
L, 3-0
L, 3-1
W, 2-1
W, 3-0
W, 4-1
L, 4-1

L, 3-2
L, 4-0
L, 2-1

Cornell
L, 4-1

L, 4-2

L, 4-1
L, 5-3
XXX W, 2-1
L, 3-2
L, 3-1
T, 1-1
L, 5-1
L, 5-3
L, 2-1
W, 5-0
L, 3-0
L, 4-2
L, 6-1

T, 3-3
L, 5-2
L, 6-2

Dartmouth
L, 4-1
L, 5-2
L, 3-2

W, 5-1
T, 3-3
L, 2-1
W, 3-2
XXX W, 7-3
W, 6-2
L, 3-1
L, 4-3
T, 2-2
W, 5-1
W, 7-1

L, 3-1

W, 4-3

L, 4-3
W, 4-3
Harvard
L, 4-1
T, 1-1
W, 5-3

W, 4-3
T, 3-3
W, 3-1
T, 1-1
L, 7-3
L, 6-2
XXX L, 3-0
T, 3-3
L, 7-2
W, 6-1
L, 6-3

L, 3-1

L, 8-5

L, 6-1
T, 4-4
Princeton
W, 4-3

W, 2-1
W, 3-1
T, 2-2
W, 3-0
W, 5-1
W, 5-3
W, 3-1
W, 4-3
W, 3-0
T, 3-3
XXX W, 3-1
W, 4-3
T, 2-2

L, 1-0
L, 6-3
W, 2-1

W, 5-3

Quinnipiac
T, 2-2

W, 5-2
W, 3-2
W, 3-1
L, 2-1
W, 2-1
L, 5-0
T, 2-2
L, 5-1
W, 7-2
L, 6-1
L, 3-1
L, 4-3
XXX L, 3-1

L, 3-2
L, 6-1
L, 2-1

L, 3-2

Rensselaer
L, 2-1
L, 3-1
W, 2-1
L, 3-1
L, 3-0
L, 4-1
W, 3-0
W, 4-2
L, 7-1

W, 6-3

T, 2-2

W, 3-1

XXX L, 6-2
L, 3-0
L, 3-2
W, 2-1
W, 4-1
W, 4-1
St. Lawrence
W, 3-2
W, 2-0
W, 3-1
W, 2-0
W, 4-1

W, 6-1

W, 3-1

W, 3-1

W, 1-0
W, 6-3
W, 3-2
W, 6-1
W, 6-2
W, 3-0
XXX L, 3-2
W, 5-4
W, 6-3
T, 2-2
Union
L, 5-0
W, 3-2
W, 5-1
W, 2-0
W, 3-2
W, 4-0
T, 3-3
W, 5-2
L, 4-3

W, 8-5

L, 2-1

W, 2-1

W, 3-2
L, 2-1
W, 3-2
L, 5-4
XXX W, 2-0
W, 5-0
Yale
L, 3-2
W, 5-1
W, 4-1
W, 3-1
W, 2-1

W, 6-2

W, 4-3
L, 4-3
W, 6-1
T, 4-4
L, 5-3

W, 3-2

L, 4-1
L, 4-1
L, 6-3
T, 2-2
L, 2-0
L, 5-0
XXX

Tie-Breaking Procedures for Championship Seeding

ALBANY, N.Y. -- Following are the ECAC Men's Hockey Championship policies pertaining to seeding and tie-breaking procedures.

Seeding for championship competition is based on total points accumulated during league contests. In the event teams are tied in the final regular-season standings, the following tiebreakers (listed in order of application) shall be used to determine seeding. (Note: Only League games apply):

  1. Comparison of game results between tied teams (head to head).
  2. Wins.
  3. Comparison of results of games against the top four teams.
  4. Comparison of results of games against the top eight teams.
  5. Goal differential in head-to-head competition.
  6. Goal differential in games against the top four teams.
  7. Goal differential in games against the top eight teams.

In the case of ties among three or more schools, the criteria will be used in order until a team, or teams, is separated from the pack. At that point, the process will begin anew to break the "new" tie. In other words, when a four-way tie becomes a three-way tie, the three-way tie is treated as a "new" tie and the process begins with the first criterion.